Real Time Enhanced Fine Tracking in Directed Energy Applications

STTR topic from AFWERX, solicitation 26.TZ. Open now. Closes 2026-09-23 (14 days left).

Component (WERX)
AFWERX
Agency
USAF
Program / Phase
STTR
Solicitation #
26.TZ
Topic #
DAF26TZ05-NV005
Status
Open
Pre-release date
2026-08-05
Open date
2026-08-26
Close date
2026-09-23 · 14 days until close · Add to calendar · See all deadlines
Set-aside
NAICS
STTR research-partner brief

Topic brief

STTR topics require a research-institution partner. Treat DAF26TZ05-NV005 as a teaming problem first, technical proposal second — AFWERX funds the collaboration, not a solo small-business essay.

STTR focus: Confirm research-institution partner and statutory work-share before deep writing. Use Find partners / Post teaming need on this page.

Who this is for

  • Small businesses with a university or FFRDC partner already identified
  • Labs seeking an industry commercialization partner
  • Firms that can split work share per STTR statutory rules

Capture playbook

  1. Confirm STTR work-share and research-partner eligibility early
  2. Lock the partner letter of commitment before writing deep technical pages
  3. Align the joint SOW to agency transition goals, not pure research
  4. Use the teaming marketplace if you still need a research partner
  5. Score fit with a readiness check before burning partner cycles

pWin cues

  • Named PI at a credible research institution with relevant publications
  • Clear commercialization path owned by the small business
  • Prior joint work or a realistic transition plan

Watch-outs

  • Partner delays kill STTR schedules more often than technical risk
  • Work-share miscalculations can make a proposal non-compliant
  • Pure research with no firm transition story underperforms at most agencies

Peer open topics

Topic brief FAQ

How is STTR different from SBIR?

STTR requires a formal research-institution partner and statutory work-share rules; SBIR can be small-business-only.

Can I post a teaming need for this topic?

Yes — use the teaming tools on the opportunity page (Team+ posts go live immediately; free/Pro posts may be moderated).

Where do I see similar past awards?

Related awards below are drawn from federal award records adjacent to this agency/topic family.

Readiness scorecard Capability match Monthly open-topic digest All topic briefs

Go / No-Go decision pack

One-click pack: competitive field, conversion signal, related awards, and (Pro) a full GO / MAYBE / NO-GO verdict against your capability.

Open scorecard Match my capability

Pro unlocks full Go/No-Go verdicts and named incumbents. Compare plans

Incumbent detector

No adjacent award history found for this topic yet. Use the decision pack and scorecard to build your own go/no-go case, and re-check after the next data refresh.

Description

To develop a real-time computational pipeline that meets the demanding latency and throughput requirements for real-time enhanced accurate 3D imaging for directed energy applications.Motivation: The growing threat of drone-based attacks has underscored the critical need for advanced counter-drone technology in the DoD. One area of interest is the potential for 3D imaging modalities to outperform 2D modalities in these circumstances. 2D imaging modalities cannot explicitly separate an object from clutter, for example, without additional image processing/hardware. Moreover, the use of coherent illuminators provides 2D imagery with non-uniform illumination patterns (scintillation) on the target and speckle noise in the target imagery. These shortcomings of 2D imaging & tracking are especially relevant to the fine track segment of the directed energy (DE) kill chain. As such, we wish to investigate 3D imaging (a.k.a. LiDaR or ladar) in conjunction with machine-learning-based declutter and image reconstruction approaches to fill in the technology gaps that are present for 2D imaging and tracking. While this topic is focused on counter-drone technologies, a top priority for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, this technology is relevant for missile defense in general, including ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missiles, which were referenced in a recent executive order [1].Benefit: AFRL/RD is interested in investigating solutions that address the problems of background clutter, scintillation, and speckle in DE-specific target tracking engagements. 3D imaging provides a leg-up over 2D imaging for several key reasons: (1) 3D imaging allows for precise range gating of the target signature from cluttered backgrounds, (2) range images, which are generated from the 3D data itself, are extremely robust against the deleterious effects of scintillation and speckle, and (3) 3D coherent imaging allows for the correction of phase aberrations that arise due to aero-optics and turbulence. Providing 3D imaging & tracking capabilities to the warfighter will greatly enhance counter-drone and counter-missile defenses as well as increase intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities as an added benefit.Main Goal: To develop a 3D imaging & tracking prototype that meets the demanding latency and throughput requirements for real-time enhanced accurate 3D imaging for DE applications.Subgoals: 1. (Basic Research) Study the pros and cons of 3D imaging modalities and determine system requirements for engagements that are of interest to AFRL/RDL. Design 3D imaging system.2.(Applied Research) Develop and improve 3D tracking and aimpoint maintenance algorithms to be used for 3D data in general.3.(Applied Research) Develop 3D imaging prototype by leveraging the results of Tasks 1 & 2into hardware development.Deliverables: Reports on PowerPoint and text-based manuscript formats. Tracking algorithms and software for 3D image processing. Hardware prototype of 3D imaging system (Phase II)

View / apply on DoD DSIP ↗

Score this topic against your capability statement

Loading teaming suggestions…